Emergency Captioning Information From the FCC - Part
2
Here's part 1.
Last year, about one-third of the inquiries and complaints handled by
the Disabilities Rights Office involved access to television by people
with disabilities. This includes concerns about:
* closed captioning,
* access to emergency information, and
* video description for people who are blind.
About 25% of all inquiries and complaints involving access to
television involved access to emergency information. This included
consumer and industry inquiries for information about our rules: what
the rules say, what they mean and who must comply.
About a third, however, rose to the level of an informal complaint
that we may serve on the television provider. Typically such complaints
are about weather emergencies --warnings about tornadoes, hurricanes,
and severe flooding. But unfortunately, since September 11, we have
received complaints from consumers about access to emergency information
involving terrorism and more recently about the anthrax mailings.
The most likely failing we see when we analyze these consumer
complaints is either:
* No access to the emergency information at all has been provided;
that is, emergency information was announced but it was not provided
visually, so deaf and hard of hearing people were left guessing what was
going on; and
* The critical details about the emergency that tell a person what to
do were missing. For instance, "Take alternate Route 50," or
"Leave the area by 6 p.m."
Now let me describe our informal consumer complaint process. A
consumer who thinks that a broadcaster is not complying with the rule
may complain to the FCC. The viewer may contact the broadcaster first,
but is not required to do so under the rule.
An informal complaint filed with the FCC should include several
pieces of information:
* the name of the local broadcast station;
* the date and time that
emergency information was not displayed; and
* the type of emergency.
Complaints about non-broadcast stations should include the name of
the programmer as well as the name of the distributor.
We accept complaints that are filed in a variety of forms: letter,
fax, telephone -- including voice, TRS and TTY -- and e-mail, for
example. If the person filing the complaint has a disability, the
complaint may be made in whatever form best accommodates his or her
disability.
Once a complaint is filed, the Commission notifies the broadcaster of
the complaint, and the broadcaster has 30 days to respond to the
complaint. Based on the information in the complaint and the response,
and any other information the FCC may request from either party, the FCC
will make its decision and take appropriate action.
Our goal in enforcing the emergency access rule is not to be
punitive. Instead, we seek to ensure that people who are deaf or hard of
hearing receive accurate, timely and critical information in the event
of an emergency -- to the same extent that people with hearing do.
In fact, there is a business case to be made for complying with the
emergency access rule. Today there are 53 million Americans with all
types of disabilities. Loss of hearing affects an estimated 28 million
people, including children, working age adults and more and more
seniors. And this number will grow as our population ages. Certainly,
when deaf or hearing-disabled people know they can rely on a given
broadcaster to provide critical, accessible information in the event of
an emergency, they will turn to that broadcaster again and again.
Complying with the emergency access rule is not only the law; it makes
good business sense as well.
The issue of homeland security has taken on central importance since
September 11. As a nation, we've seen the creation of the Homeland
Security Office within the White House and, at the FCC, Chairman Powell
has identified homeland security as one of the agency's five priority
policy areas. We look forward to working with our colleagues -- like the
Minnesota Department of Public Safety -- at the state and local levels
to undertake coordinated homeland security efforts.
The term "homeland security" encompasses a number of
activities, including emergency preparedness and the ability to
communicate important information to all citizens in the event of a
crisis. As fate would have it, last August 13th -- almost a month to the
day before the terror attacks -- the FCC issued a public notice
reminding broadcasters of their obligation to provide emergency
information in accessible formats. We are hopeful that that reminder
helped to increase broadcasters' use of captioning and other visual
displays of emergency information in the wake of the terror attacks.
We learned from September 11 the importance of the emergency access
rule. We heard from a number of hearing-impaired people that having
access to emergency information made them feel like they
"belonged" for the first time and that they were not being
left out. They felt like a part of our larger society. And so I hope
that broadcasters here today hear that by providing accessible emergency
information, they help to bring an isolated community into the
mainstream.
Because of the chaos and fear typical in crisis situations, the value
of providing accessible, accurate and ongoing information cannot be
overstated. Information is one of the best antidotes to confusion. I
feel confident that as consumers and broadcasters alike become more
aware of the emergency access rule and its purpose, it is only a matter
of time before we achieve full compliance.