Draft
Broadband Reform Bill Accommodates People with Disabilities
Editor: You
are probably aware that virtually all electronic communication is moving
to the digital world. This includes telephone service, television
broadcasting, etc. Maintaining access to these services is obviously a
high priority for people with disabilities. Happily, the bill that
Congress is considering seems to accommodate folks with disabilities,
according to the American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD).
Here's the press release from Justice for All.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Disability
Advocates Delighted with Efforts to Ensure Access in House Staff
Discussion Draft on Broadband Reform
Andrew J.
Imparato, AAPD President and CEO 202-457-0046
Washington,
DC - September 15, 2005-- The nations major disability organizations are
delighted with efforts of House legislators to address the needs of
people with disabilities in todays public release of a Discussion Draft
of federal broadband reform legislation by staff of the Energy &
Commerce Committee, U.S. House of Representatives.
The House
committee staff unveiled the draft at noon on Thursday. Noting that it
is not an officially introduced bill, the staff seeks comment from
telecommunications, cable, satellite, and other industry representatives
as well as from representatives of consumers of communications services
by September 27.
Disability
groups reacted within hours. Speaking on behalf of the National
Association of the Deaf (NAD), the nations oldest and largest
self-advocacy organization of deaf and hard of hearing Americans, NAD
governmental affairs consultant Frank Bowe said: The NAD is simply
ecstatic at the staff draft. The House staff listened to us and heard
us! Bowe is a professor at Hofstra University, on Long Island.
Added Karen
Peltz Strauss, Esq., telecommunications attorney advocating on behalf of
several disability constituencies: The proposed disability language is
truly the product of bipartisan efforts. Congressmen Upton, Barton,
Dingell, Markey, and Pickering are to be commended for their excellent
efforts to safeguard disability access to the IP technologies of the
future. These legislators understand how important it is not to leave
behind people with disabilities as the rest of the nation surges ahead
in their use and enjoyment of these innovative and exciting
technologies. Strauss is a former senior staff member of the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC).
Bowe and
Strauss pointed to language proposed in section 404 in the staff draft
entitled Access by Persons with Disabilities. The section calls for
broadband, voice over Internet protocol (VoIP), and other IP-based
communications equipment manufacturers and service providers to make
sure that their products and services are accessible to and usable by
persons with disabilities. Companies making products or offering
services do not have to provide access if they can prove that doing so
would cause their business an undue burden. In the event an undue burden
is claimed, manufacturers and providers still must find alternative ways
to make products and services compatible with adaptive equipment and
software that is specifically designed for use by people with
disabilities.
The
advocates also hailed section 208 of the staff draft. Entitled Provision
of Relay Service, this section calls for VoIP service providers to offer
relay services for individuals with hearing, speech, or other
communication-related disabilities. Current relay provisions, contained
in Section 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, do not require VoIP
service providers to do so. Relay services enable individuals who cannot
speak or hear to engage in text, voice or video communication with other
individuals through a third party called a communications assistant
(CA). Various types of relay services facilitate communication in text,
voice, sign language, and captions.
American
Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD) President and CEO Andrew
Imparato said: AAPD continues to be an active participant in the ongoing
efforts of Americans with disabilities to achieve parity in todays
communications environment. Working with the American Foundation for the
Blind, TDI, and other organizations, such as the NAD, we will monitor
developments as Congress moves from this initial staff discussion draft
toward actual legislation.