Hearing Loss Products and Services
Advertise on Hearing Loss Web
Search This Site or the Web

Free Email Newsletter

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs

Hearing Loss Web Banner
Discussion Forum
Hearing Loss Events
Last Update: Oct 10

 

Home

About Us

Search

New to Hearing Loss?
In the News

Discussion Forum

HOH-LD-News

Advertise

Contact Us

Glossary

Events

 

Issues

Access

Oral Communications

Emergency Planning

Employment

Family

Hearing Aid Affordability

Identity

Law Enforcement

Psychological

Services

 

Medical

Audiology

Causes

Cures

Meniere's Disease

Tinnitus

Local Resources and Events
 
Employment Opportunities
 
Education Opportunities
 

Hearing Loss Products and Services

Advocates and Legal
Alerting Devices
Assistive Listening Devices
Business Services

Captioning

Financial Services
General Stores

Government

Health Products and Services
Hearing Aids
Hearing Aid Accessories
Hearing Aid Batteries
Hearing Aid Maintenance
Hearing Aid Repair
Hearing Dogs
Hearing Loss Organizations
Hints and Tips
Kids' Stuff
Medical Products and Services
Pagers

Publications

Relay Service
Sign Language Materials
Telecommunications Distribution Program

Telephones

Travel

TTYs (TDDs)

TTY Repairs

Two-Way Pagers

Technology

Alerting Devices

Assistive Listening Devices

Cochlear Implants

Hearing Aids

Speech Recognition

Telephones

Two Way Pagers

TTYs (TDDs)

Visual Communications

Links

examples of hearing loss identity confusion

One of the most serious identity issues facing hard of hearing, late deafened, and oral deaf persons is the tendency of hearing people and Culturally Deaf people to lump together the "Deaf and hard of hearing". There are several distinct groups within this "catchall" phrase, as explained in Who's Who.

Identity Confusion and Denied Access

Because of this error, organizations provide interpreters thinking that their event is accessible to all persons with hearing loss.  The fact is that interpreters provide access to most Culturally Deaf people (who generally use sign language). Providing access to hard of hearing, late deafened, and oral deaf people (who rarely use sign language) is another matter entirely. The Pontiac - GMC Car Shows story illustrates this issue.

Identity Confusion and Culturally Deaf

Hard of hearing, late deafened, and oral deaf persons are often not understood by members of either the hearing world or the Culturally Deaf world. Members of each group sometimes think these people persons really belong to the OTHER group.

The PA Case Manager story illustrates how agencies that claim to serve the "deaf and hard of hearing" really mean the Culturally Deaf.

Here's a similar situation at GLAD, the Greater Los Angeles Council on Deafness.

Of course, they sometimes think hard of hearing, late deafened, and oral deaf persons belong to THEIR group, as well. The hearing impaired story is an example of a Culturally Deaf person including ALL people with hearing loss in his group.

Identity Understanding and Culturally Deaf

If you've read some of the other stories, you've no doubt realized that considering the needs of the hard of hearing, late deafened, and oral deaf is often an afterthought, if it happens at all.  That's why people with hearing loss are so delighted to be included in the beginning. Here's a happy tale about an NTID Job Announcement that specifically includes hard of hearing persons.

March 2008 - This couple want a deaf child. Should we try to stop them?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This couple want a deaf child. Should we try to stop them?

March 2008

Now the couple are hoping to have a second child, one they also wish to be deaf - and that desire has brought them into a sharp confrontation with Parliament. The government's Human Fertilisation and Embryology (HFE) bill, scheduled to go through the Commons this spring, will block any attempt by couples like Garfield and Lichy to use modern medical techniques to ensure their children are deaf. The bill is a jumbo-sized piece of legislation intended to pull together all aspects of reproductive science in Britain and pave the way for UK scientists to lead the field in embryology. But in trying to do so, the civil servants drafting the bill have provoked a great deal of unrest.  Full Story