Gallaudet President Selection
By Leonard Hall
Editor: If you're not a hearing loss news junkie like some of us, you may
have missed the ongoing discussion regarding the selection of Jane Fernandes
as the next president of Gallaudet University. For a reasonably complete
history, please point your browser to http://www.hearinglossweb.com/Issues/Identity/gal06/gal06.htm
Here's Leonard Hall with his thoughts on the matter. This article is
republished with Leonard's kind permission.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At the National Association of the Deaf (NAD) conference in California
last month, Gallaudet University President I. King Jordan in the opening
ceremony speech described the selection process of Dr. Jane Fernandes as
Gallaudet's ninth president.
The Gallaudet Board of Trustees announcement of Fernandes as president
last spring caused a major protest on the campus in Washington DC. Deaf
students set up a tent city for several weeks at the end of the semester to
continue the protest.
Jordan pointed out that few individuals understand the unique governance
system of universities and colleges where volunteers on the governing body
make the decision pertaining to selection of the president.
For Johnson County Community College (JCCC), members of the board of
trustees are elected to their positions for a four year term. It would be
wise for JCCC Board to learn from Gallaudet experience in selecting JCCC
next President.
The majority of Gallaudet Board of Trustees are deaf. For Jordan's
replacement, a presidential selection committee was established of which 13
of the 17 members are deaf.
Of the 24 applicants for the job, 21 we re deaf or hard of hearing. There
were 6 deaf semifinalists, and 3 were either a woman or people of color. The
committee recommended 3 finalists, including one deaf woman and two deaf
men.
The Board deliberated for two days before making the final decision.
Jordan stated that it was difficult, perhaps impossible, for anyone outside
of the search process to understand how thorough and comprehensive the
process was. The committee and board assured everyone that the search
process was fair.
Jordan pointed out that often there will be people who are disappointed
and surprised with the search process and many may not agreed with the
decision that is final.
Jordan went out to talk about the major changes in the world for Gallaudet
and deaf people, including the critical fact that more than 80% of the deaf
children now attend public schools.
The audience reaction to Jordan's speech was mostly positive. Later in
workshops and one public rally, the student pro testors explained their
causes in carrying on the protest.
The public rally attracted less than 100 of the 1600 deaf people attending
the national conference. In one meeting, a student asked the deaf audience
how many graduated from state schools for the deaf and less than 1/3 raised
their hands.
Jordan stated that a continuing protest hurts Gallaudet; Gallaudet must
ensure that transition to the next president is orderly and civil and can't
send the message that protestors, not the Board, govern the University.
The eyes of the world are on Gallaudet again and the people involved must
prove that they can do what is fair, right, and consistent with the best
practices in higher education.
(Leonard Hall writes a weekly column for the deaf community. He can be
reached at Legalnetwk@aol.com)
Copyright 2006 Olathe News