Number of Americans with Hearing Loss
By John Waldo
January 2010
Editor: John Waldo is an attorney and a dedicated advocate for people
with hearing loss. As you can imagine, he needs to know how many Americans
have hearing loss, and he must be able to defend his numbers. Here he is
with his thoughts on which numbers are the best to use and why!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In my advocacy work, the question comes up constantly of "how many
people are we talking about." So I've spent some time trying to find what
I think are the most solid, defensible numbers.
My favorite study -- the one I refer to as the "gold standard" -- was
published in August of 2008 in the Archives of Internal Medicine, one of
the peer-reviewed "official" journals of the American Medical Association.
The study was authored by Yuri Agrawal, a resident at Johns Hopkins
University, who worked under the supervision of John Niparko, the head of
the ENT department at Hopkins, which department is frequently ranked as
the nation's best.
In addition to the unimpeachable source, there are two things I
particularly like about the Hopkins study. First, the results are based
not on self-reporting, but on actual audiograms of a very large and
randomly selected sample of the U.S. population. Second, the study
specifically defines what it means by "hearing loss" -- actually, there
are several definitions.
The definition that I found the most meaningful is a binaural hearing
loss of 25dB or greater in the speech frequencies. That definition is
widely accepted as being the point at which hearing loss ceases to be a
mere inconvenience, and becomes "handicapping" because it interferes with
the ability to understand speech.
Using that definition, the Hopkins study found that overall, 7.8
percent of the adult population between ages 20 and 69 have a handicapping
hearing loss.
Not surprisingly, the prevalence of hearing loss increases dramatically
with age. Only six-tenths of one percent of adults between 20 and 29 have
a handicapping loss. But between 60 and 69, the prevalence of adults with
a handicapping loss increases to 31 percent. Unfortunately, the Hopkins
data do not include people 70 and over, but we all know that hearing
continues to deteriorate past that age.
When I apply those numbers to Census Bureau figures about population by
age, and make the very conservative assumption that the prevalence of
hearing loss continues to be 31 percent after age 70, I come out with
about 25 million people with a significant, handicapping hearing loss.
I know this isn't quite as dramatic as the higher numbers of 36 or 37
million. But in my work, I expect any numbers I throw out to be subject to
cross-examination, and I need to be prepared to answer questions like
"says who," and "how did they make that determination," and "what do you
mean when you say hearing loss." More than any other study I've found, the
Hopkins study gives me the tools I need to answer those questions.