Awakening OHL Community
July
2002 - Sick of folks lumping hard of hearing people together with Deaf
people, implying that they face the same issues and problems? Here's
an eloquent statement of how misleading that perception is.
February
2005 - I think the movement by HOH folks to demand an identity separate
from Deaf people is finally building. Here's one of the
situations that leads me to that conclusion!
February 2005 - Have
you ever wondered why employment ads for organizations that serve the
"deaf and hard of hearing" almost always require sign language
skills, when 95% of the "deaf and hard of hearing DO NOT SIGN?
We'll be exploring this issue in several upcoming articles. Randy
Collin's article entitled "Hard of Hearing Need
Not Apply" will start us off.
February 2005 - Here's another
article in our continuing series on the awakening oral hearing loss
community. This one is about changes at NTID to
accommodate students who prefer oral communication to signed
communication.
March 2005 - Have you ever tried to get services at
an agency that serves the "Deaf and hard of hearing"? How did
that go? Here are some thoughts on the employment
practices of agencies that claim to serve the "Deaf and hard of
hearing."
March 2005 - So just who are we
talking about here? Who are the members of this awakening oral hearing
loss community? Here's Randy Collins with his very entertaining thoughts
on the subject.
March 2005 - Another
article in our continuing series on OHL Advocacy is the report on Grace
Tiessen's 2005 SHHH California converence presentation entitled
"Grassroots Advocacy for Hard of Hearing People."
March
2005 - OK, you're convinced! Hard of hearing people
are getting a raw deal when it comes to getting services to meet their
needs. And you're ready to take action. So what's your next move? You
may want to join the OHL Advocacy group!
March 2005 - Here's
another article by Randy Collins - lots of interesting comments, as
usual - including why we need to start talking about the "hard of
hearing and Deaf" rather than the "Deaf and hard of
hearing".
April 2005 - One of the most
compelling demonstrations of the emerging oral hearing loss community is
the embracing of cochlear implants by the Deaf culture foundational
institutions - Schools for the Deaf!
April 2005 - Another
compelling article from Randy Collins - What's it about? All kinds of
stuff!
June 2005 - Further demonstration of the
Awakening OHL Community is the fact that we've made it to the mainstream
news media in a big way!
July 2005 - DeafAndHardOfHearing
- Part 1 of Many Parts Should we replace the term "hard of
hearing (HOH)" with the term "Deaf lite"? They're really
the same disability, right? It's just that "Deaf lite" folks
aren't quite as Deaf as Deaf folks, right?
July 2005 - Just when
you think you've seen it all, it turns out you're not even close to right
;-) It's bad enough when Deaf services are touted as being for the
"DeafAndHardOfHearing", but how about when they're being touted
as being just for the hard of hearing? Read more about
it here. And you'll also find a good model for a letter of complaint about
misuse of the terms!
July 2005 - We got three responses to the
previous article from people claiming that the Video Relay Service really
is for hard of hearing people, because they use it to lipread. So
we did a little research and came up with some very interesting
information!
August 2005 - Remember that questionnaire we asked you
to fill out? Thanks to all who did and for the very interesting replies
you provided. Here are the questionnaire analysis and
results.
September 2005 - You all know that interpreted theater
performances are accessible to everyone with hearing loss, right? Here's
a great letter to the editor of a local paper commenting on a story that
made exactly that claim.
September 2005 - Who defines OHL people?
Who should define them? Here's Randy Collins' thoughts on
this important issue.
September 2005 - It's
perfectly logical to require that all people who work in a
DeafAndHardOfHearing agency know sign language, right?
October 2006
- Walgreens to Sell Phone for
People with Hearing Loss
November 2006 - Another
Misleading Sorenson Press Release
January 2007 - HLAA
ED Admonishes CSD
March 2007 - TDI
Corrects Misleading Press Release about Hard of Hearing Using Video Relay
June
2007 - Lise Hamlin's Report
on the June 2007 TDI Town Hall Meeting
July 2007 -
Politics, Technology, and
the Future of DeafnessJuly 2007 - Deaf Bilingual
Coalition to Protest AG Bell's Summer Conference
November 2008 -
Researchers
Discover HOH Students Underserved ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
June 2005
We've recently published a series of articles on the "Awakening
Oral Hearing Loss (OHL)" community. The premise of these articles
is that, with the aging of the baby boomers and the assault on our
hearing from our increasingly noisy world, hearing loss is gaining focus
as an issue that needs to be addressed. As if to verify these
perceptions the cover story of the current issue of Newsweek is on
hearing loss!
The main article is a fairly comprehensive look at many aspects of
hearing loss. It discusses the growing number of people affected
(projected 78 million Americans by 2030), how noise contributes to
hearing loss, some common and not-so-common treatments, and medical and
scientific research that will hopefully yield better treatments. It also
profiles three people who have been affected by hearing loss. (One is my
wife, but that's NOT why I think this is such an important article ;-)
The online article is available at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8017906/site/newsweek/.
The print version contains, in addition to the main article, sidebars on
how hearing works, hearing aids, cochlear implants, the BAHA hearing
aid, the acoustic brainstem implant, and ways to prevent noise induced
hearing loss. It may still be on the newsstand, or drop by your local
library.
Those of us who are passionate about advocating for people with
hearing loss often lament the ignorance of the general public, the
dearth of resources for the OHL community, and the unwillingness of
people with hearing loss to really get involved. The causes and effects
of these situations are deeply intertwined, and resolving any requires
resolving all.
The decision by the major media to start telling the story will have
profound implications over the next few years. It may seem like a small
thing, but the publication of this article is just the final episode in
a long drama that requires a bunch of influential people to achieve new
understanding. By the time something like this appears in a major
magazine, underlying change is well underway.
Hang on for the ride!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HLAA ED Admonishes CSD
By Terry Portis, Ed.d, Executive Director, HLAA
Editor: Kudos to Terry Portis! I'm thrilled to see him taking a stand
on the claims by various organizations that they support hard of hearing
people by providing sign language services. Here's his comments regarding
the recent CSD claims that VRS supports 28 million people. For more of his
thoughts, please point your browser to Terry's blog (www.lightkeepersjournal.org).
These comments are reprinted with Terry's kind permission.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
January 10th, 2007
Last month at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) meeting, a
democratic commissioner and a republican commissioner both quoted
President Ronald Reagan. Given that this is in vogue, I decided to pull a
quote myself "There they go again."
I received a press release a couple of weeks ago announcing that
Communications Services for the Deaf (CSD) is going to spin off the video
interpreting services into a for-profit company. CSD has helped a lot of
people, and provided many services. Their press release, unfortunately,
contained a huge mistake.
The CSD press release stated: "VRS offers the nation's 28 million
deaf and hard of hearing individuals the ability to communicate using sign
language when making telephone calls." As I have stated many times,
the most generous estimates are that 500,000 people utilize sign language
to communicate in our country.
Every time an organization states or implies that 28 million people use
sign language, it has a negative impact for the more than 97% of people
with hearing loss who do not use sign language. It hurts our advocacy
efforts to increase services that really will help the majority of the in
this country with hearing loss.
When I point out errors like the one in the CSD press release, I am
inevitably called an audist, or someone will say that I am "anti-sign
language." All of this is done to draw attention away from the facts.
Some organizations or agencies have responded in recent years by adding
"and hard of hearing" to their names or mission statements. They
did not change, or offer any new services, but made the change to keep the
government money flowing in.