Mark Ross on Veterans and Aural Rehabilitation
\By Mark Ross
November 2009
Editor: I can't imagine a better person to write on this topic. Mark is
an audiologist with a long-term hearing loss, so he knows the topic from
both perspectives. Furthermore, was both a VA client and a VA audiologist
a few moons ago! This article originally appeared in the "Hearing Loss"
magazine, and is reprinted with the author's kind permission.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is generally agreed that the profession of Audiology had its genesis
during WW II. It arose from the efforts of the U.S. Military to provide
Aural Rehabilitation programs for the servicemen who suffered a hearing
loss. The programs developed were "state of the art," for the time, with
the government providing all it could and all it knew to the people who
returned with a service related hearing loss. Clearly, the potential
impact of a hearing loss was recognized and the government accepted its
obligation to try and ameliorate the resulting handicap. Nothing was "too
good for the boys," and cost seemed an irrelevant consideration. Later,
upon their discharge, the VA picked up the responsibility for taking care
of these men.
The programs that the VA developed were also pretty much "State of the
Art." I trained and worked for the VA myself at the end of the 50's and
the early 60's and I know that we provided our patients with whatever was
felt they needed. The VA also served as the primary incubator in which
many future Audiologists received their first clinical experiences. The
testing and HA selection procedures initially developed during WW II were
adopted and extended by the VA. During this period, in my experiences with
the VA as a patient and as an Audiologist, the profession expanded and
matured while still providing an example of excellent clinical services
that should be emulated. While there was not as much available then to
ameliorate the potential impact of a hearing loss as there is now - either
with prosthetic devices or rehabilitation procedures - the VA did what it
could with the resources it had available.
It is because of this background and history that I was so interested
in to listening to Captain Mark Brogan at the HLAA convention. Out of all
the injuries that he sustained, he considered his hearing loss as
"definitely one of the most troublesome." We all know how often the
effects of a hearing loss - this "invisible handicap" in the words of
Rocky Stone - is underestimated. For somebody like Mark Brogan, its impact
is compounded by the traumatic brain injury he also suffered. While he
received many months of therapy for his physical and brain injuries, there
was evidently nothing comparable provided to him for his hearing
impairment. For this he was given hearing aids, which fortunately have
proved to be very helpful, but more can and should be done. Being the
person he is, he has taken the initiative in seeking other sources of help
and support, such as his local HLAA chapter. But the provision of other
necessary technical and support services and should not be left to
happenstance, but should be built into the system, much the same these
services are provided for someone with a physical impairment.
While I am absolutely not comparing the handicap or impact of a missing
limb and a hearing loss - that would be arrogant and presumptuous of me -
I am recommending that the same therapeutic model be followed for those
with a hearing loss. Someone fit with an artificial limb is not dismissed
from therapy once he or she receives the prosthesis, but rather is entered
in a full-course therapy program to teach the person how best to use the
prosthesis. And so should it be for military veterans who sustain a
hearing loss while on active duty. The main challenge is not the content
of such an Aural Rehabilitation program - there are a number of good
models out there - but the necessity to full appreciate fact that a
hearing loss is not a trivial condition, one can be "treated" simply and
appropriately just with hearing aids. While these may be an absolute
necessity, they are insufficient. We may not be able to resurrect the kind
of Aural Rehabilitation program I received from the military many years
ago, but we can resurrect an attitude that viewed a hearing loss as a
potentially serious condition - and then take the appropriate steps to
ameliorate its effects.