Intratympanic Steroids for Treatment of Sudden Hearing
Loss
A new study evaluates the effect of intratympanic steroid injections in
patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) after failure to
respond to systemic steroid treatment.
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) can occur suddenly in one ear,
and generally within three days, cause a 30+ decibel (dB) hearing loss at
three consecutive frequencies. The cause for this disorder is unclear, but
research has indicated that viral infection, vascular compromise, and
immunologic diseases could be key reasons for this hearing disorder. A few
celebrities have reported experiencing sudden hearing loss. In recent years,
radio personality Rush Limbaugh and Rapper Foxy Brown both reported
experiencing sudden hearing loss.
Treatment of SSNHL remains controversial. Different approaches such as
steroids, vasodilator, antiviral agents, diuretics, and low-salt diets have
been suggested. Nevertheless, spontaneous recovery rate without treatment
ranges from 30 to 60 percent, most resolving within two weeks after onset.
As a result of its anti-inflammatory effect, high-dosage systemic steroid
therapy is currently the mainstay of the treatment for SSNHL. Despite oral
or intravenous steroid therapy for two weeks, approximately 30-50 percent of
patients show no response. Animal studies have found that intratympanic
steroid injections, introducing steroids through the tympanic membrane,
results in reduced systemic steroid toxicity and higher perilymph steroid
level selectively. Past research has focused on use of these injections as a
secondary-line therapy in SSNHL refractory cases. Other clinicians promote
its use as first-line therapy in all SSNHL cases. Nevertheless, few
controlled studies have been published comparing the results between
intratympanic steroid treatment and other approaches.
A New Study
A new study evaluates the effect of intratympanic steroid injections in
patients with SSNHL after failure to respond to systemic steroid treatment.
Patients who refused this regimen were used as controls in this research.
The authors of "Intratympanic Steroids for Treatment of Sudden Hearing Loss
After Failure of Intravenous Therapy," are Guillermo Plaza MD PhD, from the
Otolaryngology Department, Hospital de Fuenlabrada, and Carlos Herráiz MD
PhD, with the Otolaryngology Department, Fundación Hospital Alcorcón, both
in Madrid, Spain. Their findings are being presented at the 110th Annual
Meeting & OTO EXPO of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck
Surgery Foundation, being held September 17-20, 2006, at the Metro Toronto
Convention Centre, Toronto, Canada.
More on this and related
topics
Methodology
From January 2000 to December 2004, a non-randomized prospective clinical
trial was conducted for 50 patients diagnosed with unilateral (affecting one
ear) SSNHL due to unknown reasons. All patients underwent a complete
clinical history, physical and audiologic examination, syphilis serology,
autoimmune antibody test, and magnetic resonance imaging, producing negative
results. Patients were excluded if SSNHL might be caused by trauma,
Meniere's disease, tumors, or autoimmune diseases. Also, those cases that
were treated later than 30 days after onset of SSNHL were also excluded.
All cases were intravenously treated, with 120 mg of methlyprednisolone
per day, for five days. Rest, stop smoking, and low-salt diet were also
advised. Although antiviral agents or diuretic were not included in the
standard protocol, intravenous pentoxyphylline was sometimes used with the
steroids. After five days of intravenous treatment, pure-tone audiometry and
speech discrimination tests (SDT) were performed. Pure-tone average (PTA)
was calculated as the average of the thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 kHz.
After this period of intravenous therapy, failures (18 cases) were
offered intratympanic steroid treatment. Nine patients refused, and were
treated with oral steroid tapering during 15 days. They were considered as
internal controls, whereas the other nine patients received three weekly
intratympanic injections of methylprednisolone. Intratympanic steroid
treatment was started 5-7 days after onset of conservative treatment.
Pure-tone audiometry and SDT were performed just before each injection,
and one week, one month and six months after the last injection. In the
control group that refused intratympanic treatment, pure-tone audiometry and
SDT were performed one month and six months after onset. Recovery of hearing
was defined as improvement of more than 15 dBs in PTA or an increase in
speech discrimination score (SDS) of 15 percent or more. Threshold
differences were also analyzed at each frequency in PTA. Side effects and
subjective symptoms were also recorded.
Results
The average age of the study patients was 52.0 ± 15.8 years. Male to
female ratio was 22:28. Time of onset to start of intravenous therapy
averaged 5.6 ± 7.7 days. Tinnitus was present in 58 percent of the cases,
whereas vertigo presented in 24 percent. Thirty-two percent of cases had
hypertension, and 14 percent had diabetes mellitus. Initial hearing
impairment was average 76.5 ± 21.2 dB PTA, and 38 ± 12 percent.
After standard intravenous treatment, hearing improvement of 15 dB or
more in PTA was noted in 32 cases (64 percent). In these responders, the
mean improvement of the value of PTAs before and after intravenous treatment
was 35.0 ± 16.56 dB. For the 18 failures, nine patients accepted
intratympanic treatment, and were enrolled in the treatment group, whereas
the other nine served as internal controls. There were no statistical
differences in age, sex ratio, time of onset to therapy, presence of vertigo
and tinnitus, initial hearing level, and final hearing level after
intravenous treatment between the two groups.
In the treatment group, hearing improvement of 15 dB or more in PTA was
noted in five cases (55 percent). The mean value of PTA before and one month
after intratympanic injections treatment were 73.3 ± 20.8 dB and 40.2 ± 17.3
dB, respectively, so that an improvement in mean PTA after intratympanic
treatment was 33 ± 12.55 dB.
Conclusions
This non-randomized prospective clinical trial shows that intratympanic
methylprednisolone significantly improved the outcome of SSNHL after
intravenous steroid treatment. As previously reported, intratympanic
steroids actually are an effective and safe therapy in SSNHL cases that are
refractory to standard treatment.
The researchers suggest that the number of injections, the type of
steroid, and the most adequate doses must be defined in randomized
prospective clinical trials. Also, these randomized studies will allow
establishing an evidence-based treatment for idiopathic SSNHL. These trials
should also evaluate outcomes after initial therapy for SSNHL comparing
steroids that are administrated systemically or by intratympanic injections.