Humans have more distinctive hearing than animals
Editor: We all know that many animals hear better than we do, right?
Dogs, for example, respond to dog whistles that we can't even detect. Well
it turns out that this is another thing that we all know that turns out to
be incorrect, as the folks from the the Hebrew University of Jerusalem
report.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
April 2008
Do humans hear better than animals? It is known that various species of
land and water-based living creatures are capable of hearing some lower
and higher frequencies than humans are capable of detecting. However,
scientists from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and elsewhere have now
for the first time demonstrated how the reactions of single neurons give
humans the capability of detecting fine differences in frequencies better
than animals.
They did this by utilizing a technique for recording the activity of
single neurons in the auditory cortex while subjects were exposed to sound
stimuli. The auditory cortex has a central role in the perception of
sounds by the brain.
Current knowledge on the auditory cortex was largely based on earlier
studies that traced neural activity in animals while they were exposed to
sounds. And while such studies have supplied invaluable information
regarding sound processing in the auditory system, they could not shed
light on the human auditory system's own distinctive attributes.
Experimental study of neural activity in the human auditory cortex has
been limited until now to non-invasive techniques that gave only a crude
picture of how the brain responds to sounds. But recently, investigators
from the Hebrew University, the University of California, Los Angeles
(UCLA), the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Weizmann Institute of
Science were successful in recording activity of single neurons in the
auditory cortex while the subjects were presented with auditory stimuli.
They did this by utilizing an opportunity provided during an innovative
and complicated clinical procedure, which traces abnormal neural activity
in order to improve the success of surgical treatment of intractable
epilepsy.
The researchers included Prof. Israel Nelken of the Department of
Neurobiology at the Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences at the
Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Prof. Itzhak Fried from UCLA and Tel Aviv
Medical Center, and Prof. Rafi Malach of the Weizmann Institute of
Science, together with their students Roy Mukamel and Yael Bitterman.
Their work was described in an article appearing in the journal Nature.
In tests measuring response to artificial sounds, the researchers found
that neurons in the human auditory cortex responded to specific
frequencies with unexpected precision. Frequency differences as small as a
quarter of a tone (in western music, the smallest interval is half a tone)
could be reliably detected from individual responses of single neurons.
Such resolution exceeds that typically found in the auditory cortex of
other mammalian species (besides, perhaps, bats, which make unique use of
their auditory system), serving as a possible correlate of the finding
that the human auditory system can discriminate between frequencies better
than animals. The result suggests that the neural representation of
frequency in the human brain has unique features.
Interestingly, when the patients in the study were presented with
"real-world" sounds - including dialogues, music (from ''The Good, the Bad
and the Ugly'' soundtrack) and background noise - the neurons exhibited
complex activity patterns which could not be explained based solely on the
frequency selectivity of the same neurons. This phenomenon has been shown
in animal studies but never before in humans.
Thus, it can be seen that in contrast to the artificial sounds,
behaviorally relevant sounds such as speech and music engage additional,
context-dependant processing mechanisms in the human auditory cortex.