UW Implants Hybrid CI
By CHERIE BLACK
Editor: The Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center at the
University of Washington is one of the centers implanting the experimental
hybrid CI. This article first appeared in their online newsletter at
http://depts.washington.edu/hearing/pdf/bloedelsound.pdf
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Experimental surgery at UW offers a new remedy for hearing loss
Howard Davis was draped with white blankets and strapped to a table in
Operating Room 2 at the University of Washington Medical Center. The only
exposed parts of his body were his right ear and the right side of his
face.
Of the nearly 30 million Americans who are hearing-impaired, about 50
percent to 60 percent fall into this category of hearing loss in which the
two most common remedies aren't viable options, said Dr. Bruce Gantz, head
of the Department of Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery at the
University of Iowa.
Asleep under anesthesia, Davis, 61, had hoped to awaken to a chance at
better hearing. He has suffered decades of gradual hearing loss attributed
by doctors to the loud drills he has been using for years in his dental
practice.
He has low-frequency hearing, meaning he can hear vowels, but has lost
his high-frequency hearing, meaning he can't hear consonants.
Understanding people when they talk to him is nearly impossible.
Hearing aids are inadequate because they just make the muddling sound
patients hear louder, not clearer. The traditional cochlear implant --
which less than 5 percent of the hearing-impaired qualify for -- would
damage whatever hearing the patients have left.
So Davis underwent an experimental surgery last week to implant a
hybrid auditory device in his right ear as part of a newly approved Food
and Drug Administration study.
The UW Medical Center is one of 20 sites in the United States and
Europe involved in a clinical trial performing a total of 100 surgeries.
So far 90 people have undergone the surgery worldwide. The UW performed
three in January, Davis being the third.
First established at the University of Iowa, the hybrid auditory
implant uses a shorter version of the traditional cochlear implant
electrode. Surgeons and researchers hope to restore hearing without
damaging the low-frequency hearing, which would happen with a traditional,
longer cochlear implant.
For Davis, who said he avoids conversations and never does business for
his dental practice over the phone, the chance at better hearing was worth
any possible side effects.
"My children have learned to look at me when they talk so I can read
their lips and I've just faked conversations before," he said. "I've
gotten by and I don't want to do that anymore." Dr. Jay Rubenstein,
director of the Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center at the
UW, who performed the three surgeries there, called the hybrid idea
"revolutionary" because, customarily, opening up the inner ear, as with
this surgery, means destroying it. But in this case, because of the
shorter implant and extreme caution, surgeons are able to "get away with
it," he said.
The surgery's success could open doors for other potential surgical
remedies for inner ear problems such as balance difficulties or ringing in
the ear, he said.
During Davis' three-hour surgery, Rubenstein drilled into an area
behind his right ear and implanted the device into a part of the cochlea
that responds to high frequencies. The deliberate care in how far and
where to drill consumed most of the surgery time.
Once the surgery is finished, patients are tested to see if their
existing hearing is intact. All three patients who underwent the surgery
at the UW still have their hearing, Rubenstein said, and the implant will
be turned on in about three weeks, once healed from surgery.
All 100 patients will be tracked for one year to determine long-term
success or failure.
Of the 90 patients implanted with the new device, three have been
removed after patients lost hearing between three months to two years
after surgery and weren't happy with the results, Gantz said. Six patients
lost hearing, but are using hearing aids with the implant and still hear
better than they did before surgery, he said.
In most patients, the surgery has been successful, with a patient's
average word understanding increasing from 20 percent to more than 70
percent after having the implant for a year, he said.
"It's pretty impressive to take these patients and add the implant and
all of a sudden they're in a hearing world," Gantz said.
Six-month data on 100 patients and one year data on 40 or 50 patients
will be ready to present to the FDA in six to eight months, Gantz said.
"This is in response to a frustrating group of patients," Rubenstein
said. "To be able to offer an improvement to this group of patients is
remarkable."