Listening to Music through a Cochlear Implant - Part 1
By Mark Ross, Ph.D.
Editor: Cochlear implants (CIs) are changing people's lives every day!
Restoring the ability to understand speech for someone who has struggled
with that task is often a life-altering experience. And virtually all of
the CI users I know are thrilled with their progress. Music is a different
matter. Many CI users who hear remarkably well report that music just
doesn't sound good. But focused efforts by the CI manufacturers to improve
music appreciation is quite recent, and we're starting to hear stories of
CI users who once again enjoy music.
Here's Mark Ross with thoughts on his attempts to appreciate music
using his relatively recent CI. This article originally appeared in
"Hearing Loss" magazine and is reprinted with the author's kind
permission.
This is part one of four parts.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
August 2008
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four
My first exposure to music while using my cochlear implant (CI)
occurred when I left the NYU Center, right after the implant was
activated. It was a cold day in January and I was lucky to find a cab
right outside the Center to take me across town. The cabbie might have
been the only one in NY whose radio was tuned to a classical music
station. A familiar piano piece was being played; it sounded great, and I
was thrilled. This, I felt, was another good omen for successful implant
use (in addition to being able to somewhat understand the implant
audiologist's speech at that initial stage). But since at the time I was
mainly focused on understanding the cabbie's speech, I stored the music
experience in the back of my mind. This is not to say that I considered
the ability to listen to and enjoy music to be unimportant. It is, as a
matter of fact, the second most frequently expressed desire among CI
recipients. Much of our cultural and social life is bound up in exposure
to music.
In the ensuing months I did occasionally listen to music, with rather
mixed results I'm afraid. Although I was able to recognize a number of
melodies, after a while I essentially stopped listening. I think what
happened is that my memory of what music had sounded like pre-implant was
just too vivid in my mind; I would play some piece that I recognized and
had liked in the past, hear some flat notes or atonal passages, and just
quit listening. I liked music too much for too long to have the patience
to listen to it being mutilated, or so it sounded to me. So, while I had
some "successes" with musical recognition (i.e., in spite of a few
discordant notes, I could recognize a number of old favorites), I still
considered speech perception to be the primary challenge, and that's what
I focused on.
Then it occurred to me that the music I listened to pre-implant, the
sounds that I had so much enjoyed over the years, was itself distorted or
modified in some fashion. I've worn hearing aids for fifty-six years and
except for the last year or so, I've spent my life listening to music (and
everything else!) through them. But, clearly, the acoustical elements that
I perceived and those that a normal hearing person would perceive could
not be the same. The music I was hearing was being delivered to an
impaired auditory system by two imperfect hearing aids (and all of them
are imperfect to some degree). For example, hearing aids in the early
years could not amplify high frequencies very well (3 or 4 KHz was the
limit) and up to 10% distortion was considered acceptable (although enough
to give an audiophile apoplexy). But still this did not prevent me from
obtaining a great deal of pleasure while listening to music. This would be
true, to a lesser or greater degree, for every hearing aid user.
What must have been happening is that over the years the musical sounds
I heard via my hearing aids became my norm. It was what I was used to; it
had evolved into the standard to which I was now comparing the music I
heard through the implant. And, right now, the CI fell short. It therefore
seemed apparent that a similar developmental process would have to take
place with the implant if I were to fully enjoy music again. I needed to
find out whether what I heard through the implant could also evolve into
some sort of standard, one that provide me with sufficient listening
pleasure to make the effort worthwhile. To make this determination, I
needed to engage in a personal "musical auditory training" program, one
that required a significant time commitment over several months. I'll
report on my experiences and impressions in Part 2 of this article in the
next issue.
Given that my interest in this topic is both personal and professional,
the first steps I took were to examine both the professional literature
and the experiences of other implantees. I am far from the only implant
user going through this experience and CI manufacturers are well aware of
the challenge they face in this respect. By design, CIs were engineered to
improve speech perception, not music appreciation. There are significant
acoustical differences between speech and music, and processing strategies
that are appropriate for one modality may not necessarily work for the
other. In fact, while implant users can obtain excellent speech perception
scores, their recognition and enjoyment of music still leaves much to be
desired. In spite of large individual differences, implant users generally
have noted that they have difficulty recognizing and enjoying music. For
some implant users, particularly those for whom music had played an
important role in their lives, this difficulty is distressing.
To better understand exactly where listening deficiencies occur,
researchers have examined the various components of a musical signal,
i.e., the beat, rhythm, pitch, timbre, and melody. "Beat" is a steady
sound pulse, while "rhythm" is the grouping of beats to create any
succession of durations of sound. It is that aspect of the signal that
impels people to tap their toes and clap their hands. Research has shown
that implant users can perceive the rhythmical patterns of music as well
as normally hearing people. So it seems that, at a minimum, people using a
cochlear implant can respond to the rhythmical qualities of a musical
piece and enjoy and respond to that feature of the music.
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four