-    -    -    -     -    -    -    -     -    -    -    -     -    -    -    -    
Hearing Loss Products and Services
Advertise on Hearing Loss Web
Search This Site or the Web

Free Email Newsletter

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs

Hearing Loss Web Banner
Discussion Forum
In the News!
Last Update: Aug 19
-    -    -    -     -    -    -    -     -    -    -    -     -    -    -    -    
 
Home
About Us
Search
New to Hearing Loss?
In the News
Discussion Forum
HOH-LD-News
Advertise
Contact Us
Glossary
Events
 
Issues
Access
Oral Communications
Emergency Planning
Employment
Family
Hearing Aid Affordability
Identity
Law Enforcement
Psychological
Services
Medical
Audiology
Causes
Cures
Meniere's Disease
Tinnitus
Local Resources
Employment Opportunities
 
Education Opportunities
Hearing Loss Products and Services
Advocates and Legal
Captioning
Government
Hearing Aids
Hearing Aid Repair
Hearing Dogs
Hearing Loss Organizations
Hints and Tips
Publications
Technology
Alerting Devices
Assistive Listening Devices
Cochlear Implants
Hearing Aids
Speech Recognition
Telephones
Two Way Pagers
TTYs (TDDs)
Visual Communications
Links

Hearing Aids - Some observations - Part 1

By Annalise K. Walker

Editor: In this article, Annalise Walker provides some interesting perspectives on the love-hate relationship many people have with hearing aids and the hearing aid industry. You can contact Annalise at enilorak@telus.net

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I am eighty years of age and have been wearing hearing aids for more than twenty-five years now. On this basis, I would like to offer some of my observations and experiences, particularly the most recent ones.

Hearing aids are a very necessary adjunct for those of us, who have lost the ability to hear or understand sounds and words; they are necessary to continue communicating with the outside world. Some of us have a minor hearing loss; some of us, me included, have lost almost all hearing ability. In this situation, we are at the mercy of hearing aid manufacturers as well as audiologists and hearing aid practitioners, all of which can judge the effectiveness of these little instruments only by what we, the clients, are prepared or able to tell them.

At first, I wore analog hearing aids, and they seemed to be quite effective. Five years ago, I obtained, at the recommendation of my audiologist, a pair of analog programmable aids. These instruments could be programmed, with the aid of a small, digital apparatus.

My audiologist gave me the programmer, along with a descriptive leaflet, to take home and accomplish the settings in various situations to my own satisfaction. This I did and the hearing aids worked fine. Until, three years later, I was called for a re-evaluation of my hearing. My former audiologist was no longer available, and another professional lady performed a new audio test and then reset the hearing aids with the help of a computer program, instead of the special programmer. The result left much to be desired, but, being in the middle of a major move to another province, I did not go back to have the settings revised.

Having settled down in my new home, I visited a hearing aid facility and had a new audiogram taken, which showed that my hearing had not changed significantly since the previous test. I enquired about the special programmer, but was told, that such loaning of programmers is not permitted here. I then asked the audiologist to reset the hearing aids to my original settings. This was, again, done with computer software, and, although the audiologist assures me that the computer software is identical to the workings of the programmer, I was not too happy with the result. I would like, here to refer the reader to Rick Ledbetter's letter (at www.hearinglossweb.com/Technology/HearingAids/led.htm) in which he says : "Just looking at the numbers doesn't insure that the right setting will be gotten - as I learned the hard way - what is on the screen does not reflect what actually happens in the aid."

The hearing aids provided me with a lot of irritating, extraneous noises, particularly accompanying speech. A few months later, I reluctantly decided to look into obtaining new hearing aids.

On my first visit, we discussed pricing of hearing aids, and I was given several brochures covering various models of two makers. The brochures extolled the virtues of these hearing aids in glowing terms, but nowhere, on any of them, no matter of which make, were there any specifications given, nor did the brochures give the cost of the individual models; instead, the price was handwritten on the front cover.

This indicates that the cost may be flexible; and the absence of both technical data and price means that the average prospective buyer is totally in the dark of what is generally available.

When we buy computers or cameras, or cars, we look at the specifications first to see what is available and to compare the technology and cost of several models. Such items are freely advertised in newspapers and magazines, but hearing aids are not. Hearing aid information seems to be available only on the Internet, but, since the great majority of hearing impaired people are seniors, the question is : how many of them have computers and know how to get information from the Internet ?

Now to more detailed considerations :

1) Cost

Why are hearing aids so expensive? In comparison, computers cost something like $800 to $1,000, while hearing aids cost in the range of $1,500 to $3,000 and more. Computers have a far greater range and capacity than hearing aids, and perform a much greater number of tasks - often several at one time - as well as far more complicated tasks than hearing aids.

There should be a law that cost of hearing aids be itemised, so that the buyer knows exactly what the instrument itself costs, what is the cost of the audiogram, and what is charged for additional consultation with the audiologist. As mentioned above, buying a hearing aid through an audiologist, limits us severely in our choice and in making comparisons between various makes. In fact, in most cases we don't know what other makes and models exist and at what price. We should be able, audio graph in hand, to shop around and compare, before we commit ourselves. Instead we are limited to the recommendations of our audiologist, and few of us have the nerve to say "no thanks" and go somewhere else. As things are at present, "going somewhere else" will, almost certainly, involve yet another audiogram - and an additional $50 in consultation fees.

Here's Part 2