Oticon Medical Bone Conduction Sound Processor
November 2010
Preliminary results of the first independent study of differences in two
new bone conduction sound processors indicate that the newest manufacturer
to enter the bone anchored hearing market may provide solutions that offer
increased benefit for people with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
Researchers reported statistically significant results that ranked Oticon
Medical's Ponto Pro sound processor superior to Cochlear's BP 100 processor
in several key benefits including speech perception and ease of use. The
study, conducted by researchers at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, a leading
specialty hospital and Denmark's largest educational institution for medical
science programs, involved individuals with conductive and mixed hearing
loss who were first time users of bone anchored hearing systems.
Researchers presented their preliminary findings at the 11th
International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Other Implantable Auditory
Technologies in Stockholm, Sweden and the Danish Teknisk Audiologisk Selskab/Danish
Technical Audiological Society in Vejle, Denmark.
Bone-anchored hearing solutions benefit people with hearing losses due to
malfunctioning of the ear canal or middle ear (conductive or mixed hearing
loss) with an air-bone gap of more than 30 dB (PTA) and single-sided
deafness. The Ponto Pro processor is part of the new Ponto bone anchored
implant system introduced in 2009 by Oticon Medical, a global medical device
company within the William Demant Group. The advanced digital and
programmable sound processor is built on the proprietary Oticon Rise(tm)
platform, one of the world's most advanced sound technologies. The BP100 is
manufactured by Cochlear, the successor of the original Baha(r)
manufacturer.
Twelve subjects with conductive and mixed hearing loss tested each device
for an average of 34 days in their daily environments. The sound processors
were fit in random order and according to the manufacturers' fitting
guidelines. No fine tuning was performed. Subjects rated the sound
processors at the end of each test period.
The study's statistically significant findings indicate the superiority
of Ponto Pro over the BP 100 in speech perception and ease of use, two key
parameters for bone anchored hearing systems.
Based upon trials in study participants' daily environments, Ponto Pro
was rated significantly better than BP 100 when conversing with one person
in a car and when listening to the TV or radio - two traditionally
challenging listening situations for people that rely upon bone anchored
sound processors.
Additionally, in an objective speech in noise test, measurement of speech
reception thresholds (SRT) showed a statistical improvement of about 3dB in
Ponto Pro's full directionality mode compared to its omnidirectional
setting. This is equivalent to an improvement in speech intelligibility of
approximately 30 percent. No similar improvement was evident in subject
rankings of the BP100's directional versus omnidirectional modes. The speech
was presented from a front loudspeaker and the noise presented from the
loudspeakers placed at +/- 90 degree angles.
Subjects also found Ponto Pro significantly easier to handle in daily
usage tasks such as changing the battery and adjusting the controls. Ease of
use is an important benefit since bone anchored hearing solutions are an
integral part of a user's daily routine. Typically, the processors are the
first thing users put on each day and the last thing taken off each night.
At the conclusion of the study subjects were given the option to choose
one of the processor models for their continued use. Of the original twelve
subjects, eight study participants selected Ponto Pro and four selected the
BP100.
The study was conducted by Steen Ostergaard Olsen, Henrik Glad and Lars
Holme Nielsen of the Research Laboratory, Department of Otorhinolaryngology,
Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Rigshospitalet. The study was
initiated and conducted with no outside funding or grants.